Some Reluctant Skepticism about Rational Insight

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract There is much to admire in John Pittard’s recent book on the epistemology of disagreement. But here we develop one concern about role that rational insight plays his project. Pittard develops and defends a view which party peer disagreement can show substantial partiality own view, so long as he enjoys even moderate into truth or cogency reasoning for view. argues this may happen ordinary cases religious disagreement—cases it’s live skeptical possibility misdescribing insight, not having at all—and therefore need be strongly conciliatory face Yet agrees should involving, e.g., visual perception dim since sort fallible, corrigible evidence involved such counterbalanced by symmetrical part one’s disagreeing peer. We worry there’s an inconsistency here. If unreasonable experience (or insight) like “Horse Race” “Restaurant Check,” likewise disagreements fallible it is.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Skepticism about Character Traits

Sartre (1956) describes ways in which one may present oneself to others as being a certain sort of person. In one of his examples, a waiter presents himself as a waiter by as it were acting the part of a waiter. More generally, Sartre argues that, wanting to be, or at least to appear to others to be, a person of a certain sort or character, one often acts the part of a person of that sort of ch...

متن کامل

Response to “Skepticism about desert”

Swartzer concludes the paper with the claim that desert is not a basic normative notion. It cannot “supply first principles of justice.” (p. 1) In other words, desert is to be defined in terms of justice, not the other way around. What we deserve just is what we are to receive according to the demands of justice. On this view, to say that a just distribution of goods is such that everyone recei...

متن کامل

Acquaintance and Skepticism about the Past

I consider the problem of skepticism about the past within Richard Fumerton’s acquaintance theory of noninferential justification. Acts of acquaintance occur within the fleeting present. But if the data for noninferential justification is limited to the fleeting present then the options for avoiding a far-reaching skepticism are quite limited. I consider Fumerton’s responses to skepticism about...

متن کامل

Central IRBs: why are some institutions reluctant to sign on?

There are several good reasons why hospitals and cancer centers would want to use central institutional review boards (IRBs) to supplement their often over-burdened local boards that are charged with overseeing research involving human subjects. What's more, several national agencies support central IRBs: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a draft guidance in March to help increase aw...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2210-5697', '2210-5700']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10053